From Undecidability Require Export Problems.Reduction DecidableEnumerable.
Lemma dec_red X (p : X -> Prop) Y (q : Y -> Prop) :
p ⪯ q -> decidable q -> decidable p.
Proof.
intros [f] [d]. exists (fun x => d (f x)). intros x. rewrite H. eapply H0.
Qed.
Lemma red_comp X (p : X -> Prop) Y (q : Y -> Prop) :
p ⪯ q -> (fun x => ~ p x) ⪯ (fun y => ~ q y).
Proof.
intros [f]. exists f. intros x. now rewrite H.
Qed.
Section enum_red.
Variables (X Y : Type) (p : X -> Prop) (q : Y -> Prop).
Variables (f : X -> Y) (Hf : forall x, p x <-> q (f x)).
Variables (Lq : _) (qe : enum q Lq).
Variables (x0 : X).
Variables (d : eq_dec Y).
Fixpoint L (LX : enumT X) n :=
match n with
| 0 => []
| S n => L LX n ++ [ x | x ∈ L_T X n , f x el Lq n ]
end.
Lemma enum_red LX :
enum p (L LX).
Proof.
split.
- intros ?. cbn; eauto.
- split.
+ intros H.
eapply Hf in H. eapply qe in H as [m1]. destruct (el_T x) as [m2 ?].
exists (1 + m1 + m2). cbn. in_app 2.
in_collect x; eapply cum_ge'; eauto; try omega.
eapply qe.
+ intros [m H]. induction m.
* inv H.
* cbn in H. inv_collect.
eapply Hf. eapply qe. eauto.
Qed.
End enum_red.
Lemma enumerable_red X Y (p : X -> Prop) (q : Y -> Prop) :
p ⪯ q -> enumerable__T X -> discrete Y -> enumerable q -> enumerable p.
Proof.
intros [f] [] % enum_enumT [] % discrete_iff [L] % enumerable_enum.
eapply enum_count, enum_red with (Y := Y); eauto.
Qed.
Theorem not_decidable X Y (p : X -> Prop) (q : Y -> Prop) :
p ⪯ q -> enumerable__T X -> ~ enumerable (compl p) ->
~ decidable q /\ ~ decidable (compl q).
Proof.
intros. split; intros ?.
- eapply H1. eapply dec_red in H2; eauto.
eapply dec_compl in H2. eapply dec_count_enum; eauto.
- eapply H1. eapply dec_red in H2; eauto.
eapply dec_count_enum; eauto. now eapply red_comp.
Qed.
Theorem not_coenumerable X Y (p : X -> Prop) (q : Y -> Prop) :
p ⪯ q -> enumerable__T X -> ~ enumerable (compl p) -> discrete Y ->
~ enumerable (compl q).
Proof.
intros. intros ?. eapply H1. eapply enumerable_red in H3; eauto.
now eapply red_comp.
Qed.